Attention Test — Inhibitory Control
Anti-Saccade Test
A cue flashes on one side. For most trials, click to the opposite side (anti-saccade). Occasionally you'll click toward it (pro-saccade). Your brain's reflex wants to look at the flash — the test measures how well you suppress it. 30 trials.
Anti-Saccade Test
How to play:
- • A fixation cross + appears at center
- • A flash appears briefly on left or right
- • If you see "ANTI" — click the opposite side
- • If you see "PRO" — click the same side
- • 2 second response window per trial
Don't lose this result
Sign up to track your inhibitory control score and watch it improve.
What is an anti-saccade?
A saccade is a rapid ballistic eye movement — the fastest movement the human body makes, reaching angular velocities of 700°/second. Most saccades are reflexive: when something appears in your peripheral visual field, the superior colliculus and parietal cortex generate an automatic orienting saccade toward it within 100–150ms, before conscious awareness. This reflexive system evolved for predator detection and cannot be eliminated — only suppressed.
An anti-saccade requires the opposite response: when a peripheral cue appears, you must suppress the reflexive saccade toward it and generate a voluntary saccade in the opposite direction. This requires the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to actively inhibit the superior colliculus — a key window into the neural machinery of executive function and voluntary behavioral control. The anti-saccade task was developed by Hallett (1978) and remains one of the most widely used paradigms in cognitive neuroscience for studying inhibitory control.
Why anti-saccades are hard
The anti-saccade task is difficult because it requires two simultaneous operations: inhibiting the reflexive pro-saccade (suppressing the urge to look at the flash) and generating a voluntary saccade in the mirror-image direction. Both operations are controlled by the same prefrontal circuits under a tight time constraint.
When the DLPFC fails to generate sufficient inhibitory signal in time, the reflexive saccade escapes and an anti-saccade error occurs — the eye moves toward the cue rather than away from it. Error rates are highly sensitive to DLPFC state: they increase with sleep deprivation, alcohol intoxication, cognitive load, anxiety, and aging. Even brief distracting tasks performed immediately before the cue increase error rates by 5–15%. This sensitivity makes anti-saccade error rate one of the most reliable biomarkers of frontal lobe function available to cognitive scientists.
Score distribution — 620K scores
| Percentile | Anti-saccade accuracy | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Top 5% | 96–100% | Exceptional |
| Top 20% | 88–95% | Above average |
| 50th (median) | 76–88% | Average |
| Bottom 25% | 60–76% | Below average |
| Bottom 10% | <60% | Low inhibition |
Anti-saccade and schizophrenia
Elevated anti-saccade error rates in schizophrenia is one of the most replicated findings in all of psychiatric research. Across hundreds of studies spanning 40 years, patients with schizophrenia show error rates 2–3 times higher than healthy controls (typically 40–60% vs 15–25%), with the effect observed regardless of medication status, symptom severity, or illness chronicity.
The impairment reflects structural and functional abnormalities in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex — the region most consistently implicated in schizophrenia pathophysiology. Anti-saccade error rates are also elevated (though less severely) in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients who have never had the illness, suggesting the deficiency reflects an endophenotype linked to genetic vulnerability rather than the illness or its treatment.
Anti-saccade deficits have also been documented in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, ADHD, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and early Alzheimer's disease — though the magnitude and pattern differ across conditions. The task is increasingly used as a transdiagnostic biomarker of prefrontal integrity in clinical research and pharmaceutical development. Improving your attention and choice reaction time through regular cognitive training is associated with modest but consistent improvements in anti-saccade accuracy.
How to improve inhibitory control
Mindfulness meditation
Eight weeks of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) significantly improves anti-saccade accuracy in controlled trials. The practice of repeatedly returning attention to a focus point while resisting distraction directly trains the inhibitory circuits tested here. Even 10 minutes/day shows measurable effects after 4 weeks.
Aerobic exercise
Acute aerobic exercise (30 minutes at moderate intensity) produces immediate improvements in anti-saccade accuracy lasting 1–2 hours, mediated by elevated dopamine and norepinephrine in the prefrontal cortex. Long-term aerobic exercise programs increase gray matter volume in DLPFC, improving baseline inhibitory capacity.
Cognitive training
Repeated practice of inhibitory control tasks — including this test — produces modest but reliable improvements. The most effective protocols interleave pro-saccade and anti-saccade trials unpredictably, forcing the DLPFC to actively maintain the task rule on every trial rather than developing a routine. Practice the attention test alongside this for complementary inhibitory training.
Protect your sleep
The DLPFC is among the brain regions most sensitive to sleep deprivation. One night of total sleep deprivation nearly doubles anti-saccade error rates. Chronic mild sleep restriction (6 hours/night for two weeks) produces the same impairment as 24 hours without sleep — and users consistently underestimate their own impairment under these conditions.
Global Statistics
On this page
Try next
Track your improvement
Create a free account to save anti-saccade scores and track inhibitory control over time.
Sign up free