Is the Dvorak keyboard layout faster than QWERTY?
The short answer: no reliable speed advantage for Dvorak has been demonstrated in rigorous controlled studies. The original 1936 Dvorak study (by Dvorak himself) was methodologically flawed. Modern independent research finds negligible differences in trained users.
The Dvorak layout was designed to reduce finger travel by placing the most common English letters on the home row. This is measurably true — Dvorak typists move their fingers less. But reduced finger movement has not translated into consistent speed gains in controlled experiments.
| Factor | QWERTY | Dvorak |
|---|---|---|
| Home row letters | ASDF JKL; (25% of English) | AOEUI DHTNS (70% of English) |
| Finger travel per 1k words | ~1.6 miles (left-heavy) | ~1.0 miles (more balanced) |
| Speed in studies | Baseline | No significant difference |
| Switching cost | N/A (already trained) | ~4–8 weeks of slowdown |
| Software support | Universal | Native in all major OS |
| Speed record holders | Yes (Barbara Blackburn: Dvorak) | Yes (most top typists: QWERTY) |
The practical verdict: If you're already a fluent QWERTY typist, switching to Dvorak is not worth it for speed. The switching cost (weeks of lost productivity) is near-certain; the speed gain is not. Dvorak may reduce repetitive strain injury risk, but this is also unconfirmed in large studies.
If you're starting fresh with zero typing habits, both layouts are equally valid. Most people choose QWERTY because it means every shared computer, phone, and keyboard will match. Whatever layout you use, the Typing Speed test measures your actual performance.
Test your typing speed
Free — no account needed — instant WPM and accuracy.
Quick Answer
Research is inconclusive. Controlled studies find no significant speed advantage for Dvorak in trained users. The biggest factor is always familiarity — switching layouts costs weeks of lost productivity with uncertain long-term gain.
Related Test
More Questions
Go deeper
The Science Page
Peer-reviewed research and full methodology.